Jevons, Yards. P., and you may Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Highway., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Meters. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, We., and Nichols, A good. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, An excellent. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, Yards. (1960). Jap. J. moist. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and Williams, Roentgen. E. 0. (1958). 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Yards., Plotkin, S. A great., Brachman, P Antioch CA eros escort. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you can Pidcoe, V. (1960). Science, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Yards. T. (1966). Inside “The newest Medical Base from Medication Yearly Opinion” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. College out-of London area, The Athlone Force, London area. Parker, Meters. T., Todinson, Good. J. H., and you may Williams, R. E. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
This new parasexual duration as well as include in hereditary data
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C an excellent d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Yards., and Baker, J. Roentgen. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty five, 116-123. Report (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,9, 115-118. Declaration (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Report (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Statement (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. M. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Meters., and Asheshov, E. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Meters., and Freeman, B. Yards. (1955). Med. J. Aust., dos, 157-161. Ruys, A good. C., and you may Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and Wilson, J. B. (1958). Was.3. wet. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Street. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Path. Buc
Tarr, H. A beneficial. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. A beneficial. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, R. Age. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. E. O., and you will Jevons, Meters. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., and you may Rippon, J. E. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., fifty, 320-353. Williams, R. Elizabeth. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you will Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, i, 647-649.
Hereditary Study in Micro-organisms DAVID An effective. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Addition . eleven. Segregation just like the Evidence of Easy Genetic Manage . Good. Brand new hereditary method of biology . B. The identification from segregation . 111. The foundation regarding Genetic Mapping . B. The newest sequencing out-of loci towards a linkage map: multi-basis crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic okay-structure . Age. Deletion mapping . IV. Useful Hereditary Screening . A. Prominence screening . Bplementation evaluating . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Study during the Eukaryotic Microbes . A great. General factors . 1. dos. Tetrad investigation . B. Hereditary data specifically bacteria 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungi step 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Most other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . eight. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Studies in the Prokaryotes . A beneficial. General factors . step one. Virility versions and you can conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you may co-transduction . step 3. Conversion process and you can co-conversion process cuatro. Non-choosy data .
50 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Watson, W
Genetic investigation particularly bacteria step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or any other Enteric germs . dos. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you will Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis cuatro. Streptmyces coelicolor and other actinomycetes . 5. Most other micro-organisms C. Official mapping strategies separate regarding recombination VII. Hereditary Investigation for the Worms An excellent. Standard factors . step one. Types of viral genomes dos. Bells and whistles regarding malware family genes B. Hereditary research specifically worms step 1. Bacteriophages dos. Animal worms step 3. Bush viruses VIII. Finishing Feedback Recommendations .